ref: 3cd51d001769c657ebb4184bd05343af4d7e12b1
parent: 232cbaf5a8affcb0c61f1355f0569efaae534ad9
author: Ben Harris <[email protected]>
date: Thu Feb 16 10:54:17 EST 2023
Solo: cope with pencil marks when tilesize == 1 Solo's layout calculations for pencil marks could fail with a tilesize of 1, generating an assertion failure: "draw_number: Assertion `pbest > 0' failed." This was reported as Debian bug #905852. My solution is slightly silly, namely to change a ">" in the test for whether a new layout is the best so far to ">=". This allows for finding a (terrible) layout even for tilesize == 1, and also has the side-effect of slightly preserring wide layouts over tall ones. Personally, I think that's an improvement.
--- a/solo.c
+++ b/solo.c
@@ -5133,7 +5133,7 @@
fw = (pr - pl) / (float)pw;
fh = (pb - pt) / (float)ph;
fs = min(fw, fh);
- if (fs > bestsize) {+ if (fs >= bestsize) {bestsize = fs;
pbest = pw;
}